Ahmed Urabi
Colonel
Ahmad Urabi (April 1, 1841 - September 21, 1911), also known as Urabi Pasha
, was a member of the Egyptian army who revolted against the khedive and the
European domination of Egypt in 1879 in what has become known as the Urabi
Revolt.
Urabi was born a peasant in the small town of Hiryat Raznah. He was the son
of a village leader and one of the wealthier members of the community, which
allowed him to get a decent education. He was not trained at the western
schools, but rather had received a traditional Islamic education. He entered
the army and moved up quickly through the ranks of the army, reaching
Lieutenant Colonel by age 20.
He was a galvanizing speaker. Because of his origins he was at the time, and
is still often today, viewed as an authentic voice of the Egyptian people.
Ahmed Urabi's first intervention in politics occurred when Khedive Tawfiq
issued a new law preventing peasants from becoming officers. Urabi lead the
group protesting the preference shown to Turkish officers. Urabi and his
followers, which included most of the army, were successful and the law was
repealed.
Urabi and his allies in the army joined with the reformers and with the
support of the peasants launched a broader effort to try to wrest Egypt from
foreign control, and also to end the absolutist regime of the Khedive. The
revolt spread to express resentment of the undue influence of foreigners.
Urabi was first promoted, then made under-secretary for war, and ultimately
a member of the cabinet. Plans were begun to create a parliamentary
assembly. During the last months of the revolt (July to September 1882), it
was claimed that Urabi held the office of prime minister.
Feeling threatened, Khedive Tawfiq called on the sultan to quell the revolt,
but the Sublime Porte hesitated to employ troops against Muslims who were
opposing foreign interference. The British were especially concerned
that Urabi would default on Egypt's massive debt and that he might try to
gain
control of the Suez Canal. Thus when anti-European riots broke out in
Alexandria in 1882 the British fleet opened fire on the city's forts. In September of that year a British army was landed in the Canal Zone and on September 13, 1882 they defeated Urabi's army at the Battle of Tel al-Kebir. Urabi was captured. The khedive and his cabinet sentenced him to death, but
under pressure the sentence was commuted and Urabi was exiled to the
British colony of Ceylon, where he spent the rest of his life inviting the
locals to Islam & teaching them Arabic.
While the British intervention was meant to be short term, it in fact
persisted until 1952. Egypt was effectively made a colony until 1922.
Urabi's revolt also had a long lasting significance as the first instance of
Arab anti-colonial nationalism, which would later play a very important role
in Egyptian history. Especially under Nasser, Urabi would be regarded as an
Egyptian patriot, a national hero.
|
Urabi Revolt
The
Urabi Revolt was an uprising in Egypt in 1881-82 against the Khedive and
European influence in the country. It was led by and named after Colonel
Ahmed Urabi.
Egypt in the 1870s was corrupt, tyrannically misgoverned and in a state of
financial ruin. Huge debts rung up by Ismail Pasha could no longer be
repaid and under pressure from the European banks that held the debt, the
country's finances were being controlled by representatives of France and
Britain. When Ismail had tried to rouse the Egyptian people against this
outside control he was deposed by the Europeans and replaced by his more
pliable son Tawfiq.
The upper ranks of the civil service, the army, and the business world had
become dominated by Europeans, who were paid more than native Egyptians.
Within Egypt a parallel legal system for trying Europeans separately from
the natives was set up. This angered the educated and ambitious Egyptians in
the military and civil service who felt that the European domination of top
positions was preventing their own advancement. The heavily taxed peasants,
the fellahin, were also annoyed at their taxes going to Europeans who lived
in relatively wealthy surroundings.
Just as important as European domination were the Turco-Circassians who
controlled most of the other elite positions in the government and military.
Mercenaries that had come to Egypt along with Muhammad Ali this elite was
highly favored by the Khedive. Turkish was still the official language of
the army, and the Turks were more likely to be promoted. Of the ruling
cabinet under Tawfiq every member was a Turco-Circassian.
The growing fiscal crisis in the country sparked the Khedive to drastically
cut the army. From a height of 94,000 troops in 1874 the army was cut to
36,000 in 1879, with plans to shrink it even more. This created a large
class of unemployed and disaffected army officers within the country.
The disastrous campaign in Ethiopia in 1875-1876 also angered the officers
who felt that the government had sent them unwisely into the conflict.
Tension built over the summer of 1881 as both the Khedive and the Egyptian
officers, now led by Urabi, searched for supporters and gathered allies. In
September the Khedive ordered Urabi's regiment to leave Cairo. Urabi refused
and ordered the dismissal of the Turco-Circassian generals and the creation
of an elected government. Unable to oppose the revolt Tawfiq agreed and a
new chamber of deputies was established containing a number of Urabi's
allies.
On January 8 of 1882 the French and British sent a joint note that asserted
the primacy of the Khedive's authority. The note infuriated the
parliamentarians and Urabi. The government collapsed and a far more radical
one with Urabi as minister of war was created. This new government
threatened the positions of Europeans in the government, and began also
laying-off large numbers of Turco-Circassian officers.
This broad effort at reform was opposed by the European interests, and many
of the large landowners, the Turkish and Circassian elite, the high ranking
ulema, the Syrian Christians, and most of the wealthiest members of society.
It had the support of most of the rest of the population including the lower
ulema, the officer corps, and local leaders.
The Coptic Christians were divided between both sides. Their close
affiliation with Europeans angered many and sometime made them a target, but
the deep rivalry between Coptic and Syrian Christians led many to align with
the rebels. Urabi
and other leaders of the revolt acknowledged the Copts as potential allies
and worked to prevent any targeting of the minority, but were not always
successful since the English tried many times to plant
riots to divide the Egyptians in order to make them an easier prey.
An effort to court the Ottoman Sultan began. Khedive Tawfiq called on the
sultan to quell the revolt, but the Sublime Porte hesitated to employ troops
against Muslims who were opposing foreign Christian interference. Urabi
asked the Sultan to depose Tawfiq, but again the Sultan hesitated.
On the afternoon of June 11, 1882 the political turmoil exploded into
violence on the streets of Alexandria. Rioters attacked Greek, Maltese and
Italian businesses and battles broke out in the streets. About fifty
Europeans and 250 Egyptians were killed. The exact cause of the revolt is
uncertain; both the Khedive and Urabi have been blamed for starting it, but
there is no proof of either allegation.
In response the British fleet off Alexandria under Admiral Seymour bombarded
the city. The French fleet also at Alexandria, refused to participate. The
British then landed troops in the city to restore order.
As revolts spread across Egypt, the British House of Commons voted in
favour
of a larger intervention. In September of that year a British army was
landed in the Canal Zone. The motivation for the British intervention is
still disputed. The British were especially concerned that Urabi would
default on Egypt's massive debt and that he might try to gain control of the
Suez Canal. On September 13, 1882 the British forces defeated Urabi's army
at the Battle of Tel al-Kebir. Urabi was captured and eventually exiled to
the British colony of Ceylon.
Historians have in general been divided, with one group seeing the revolt as
a push for liberalism and freedom on the model of the French Revolution and
others arguing it was little more than a military coup.
|